Archive for July, 2010

At Bishop’s, expect quiet perfection

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

John Bishop does not rest on his laurels as one who has defined the way we eat

Joanne Sasvari
Sun

John Bishop and chef Andrea Carlson pose in Bishop’s Restaurant in Vancouver with Milan’s Heirloom Tomato Salad. Photograph by: Steve Bosch, Vancouver Sun, Special to The Sun

John Bishop is nothing short of a legend in Vancouver, and not because of those White Spot ads. Or, for that matter, the four books, charity work and public appearances.

Over the past quarter century, he has quietly defined the way we eat and the way we think about food in this city, all from a tiny, 800-square-foot restaurant on a busy stretch of West Fourth Avenue.

Ironically, though, thanks to the culinary revolution he helped start, there are so many fancy new restaurants to visit, it may have been a long time since you actually dropped by the one that started it all.

And that’s too bad, because there has never been a better time to dine at Bishop’s.

All the elements in this elegant little eatery, from owner to service to chef, have come together perfectly, all at a time when the city’s culinary scene has never been more exciting.

“It’s a great time in this city and this province to be in food,” Bishop says.

Bishop, of course, was one of the first local chefs to promote the now nearly universal idea of using local ingredients, back when he opened his restaurant during the recession that had Vancouver in its grip less than a year before Expo ’86.

A soft-spoken Englishman, he’d arrived in Vancouver in the early 1970s planning, like so many others, to stay a year. Then he fell in love with both the city and the woman who would become his wife, decided he might as well stay a while longer, and went off to cook for another local culinary icon, Umberto Menghi.

Since he went out on his own in 1985, countless talented cooks have gone through his own kitchen. But the best fit may just be his current chef, Andrea Carlson, formerly of Sooke Harbour House and Raincity Grill.

“I was instantly taken with her,” he says. “She’s just an amazingly passionate person. She seems very much in that Alice Waters style, only more so.”

Like Waters, the woman often credited with starting the California cuisine movement from her Berkeley restaurant Chez Panisse, Carlson is as much gardener as she is cook.

“She cooks with her palate,” Bishop explains, adding, “There’s a wonderful complexity to her food.”

Still, the question is: After 24 years and countless imitators, not to mention those White Spot ads, how does the city’s original West Coast restaurant hold up? Remarkably well, it turns out.

Bishop’s is an oasis of cool, quiet calm in a city where the noise levels even in fine-dining establishments can be riotous, and the décor almost as jarring. It is still a small, cosy space on two levels, with pale walls, white tablecloths, white orchids and a fine collection of first nations art.

Remarkably, given the economy, most nights are sellouts here. (“Being small helps,” Bishop says lightly.) Part of that is certainly due to the service, which is perfectly, easily, casually attentive without ever being intrusive.

Credit the charming maitre d’ Abel Jacinto for a team that’s so thoughtful that when a guest sneezes, a packet of tissues quietly appears at her elbow. But good service and nice paintings aren’t enough to keep a restaurant full, especially when the entrees are over $30 and so many people are watching their budgets.

The real magic here is happening in the kitchen.

It comes as almost a shock to remember that food can be this good. This is not fussy food, drenched in sauces or molecularized out of recognition. It has a strong background in the classics, with a lively sense of flavours and a strong respect for ingredients.

For instance, an evanescently seasonal zucchini blossom fritter stuffed with ricotta is perfectly crisp and light, arranged prettily atop tender baby beets and grilled sweet Walla Walla onions.

Perfectly seared duck breast arrives on a bed of tiny, savoury spaetzle. Stuffed rabbit loin is nicely paired with nutty, chewy wild rice studded with tiny chanterelles and the surprise of tartly sweet roasted apricots.

The wonderful flavours continue into dessert, whether it’s the richly chocolatey, hot fudge brownie sundae or the crisp, sweet fried fig empanada with brown sugar ice cream.

But the highlight of the evening is when Bishop himself comes over to quietly say hello, as he does with every guest every night that he’s in the city.

“When I’m here,” he says, “that’s where I want to be.”

And most of his guests would agree.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Mount Pleasant says no to 11-storey tower

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Council orders social housing site scaled back by three floors

Jeff Lee
Sun

Vancouver council bent to the wishes of the Mount Pleasant neighbourhood Tuesday, ordering a proposed 11-storey residential tower on one of its 14 city-owned social housing sites scaled back to eight storeys

But in telling B.C. Housing and the Vancouver Native Housing Society to go back to the drawing board, they have put at risk 24 units of rental housing proposed for the top three floors, said society head Dave Eddy.

The decision followed three rough days of public hearings in which neighbours made it clear they wanted the city to stay within the neighbourhood maximum height of six storeys — while housing advocates said the 103 social housing units and 24 market rental units are desperately required for the city’s native youth.

Even at eight storeys, the project at the northwest corner of Broadway and Fraser is too high and will make many neighbours angry, said Steve Jung, a neighbour who opposed the development.

In asking for the three-storey reduction, council said the architects could come up with a design for a longer, wider building that would allow them to incorporate market rental units within the allowable height.

But Eddy and project architect Larry Adams said they aren’t sure that will work, given the changes would violate the city’s urban planning design guidelines, which govern things like the shape and form of buildings and setback from property lines.

“It doesn’t meet planning’s urban design objectives. We’ve worked with planning since 2008 and they’ve been clear about what they will allow,” said Adams, the principal of NSDA Architects. “It’s doable, but the question is whether planning will consider it too dense.”

Eddy said the likelihood is that the society will simply scrap the top three floors of market rental housing, even though that’s what the community needs.

“We will take a bash at redesigning it but we’re not going to beat ourselves to death. If we see a lot of resistance from planning we’ll drop the affordable rental. The irony is that this is what the community wanted. We want to build the rental housing because we believe there’s a need for a full range of housing options.”

Although council voted unanimously for the change, councillors Suzanne Anton and Ellen Woodsworth said they would have preferred the full 11 storeys.

Anton questioned why, if council was prepared -allow 20-plus storey rental buildings in the West End, it wouldn’t allow three storeys of rental on top of social housing in Mount Pleasant.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Home construction sinks in June, but building permits gain

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Alan Zibel, AP Real Estate Writer

USA Today

WASHINGTON — Home construction plunged last month to the lowest level since October as the economy remained weak and demand for housing plummeted.

But building permit applications, a sign of future activity, rose 2.1% from a month earlier to an annual rate of 586,000

The Commerce Department says construction of new homes and apartments in June fell 5% from a month earlier to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 549,000. May’s figure was revised down to 578,000.

Driving the June decline in housing starts was a more than 20% drop in the volatile condominium and apartment market. Construction of single-family homes, the biggest part of the market, dropped only 0.7%.

The slumping job market and competition from foreclosed properties have forced builders to limit construction, especially after tax credits that spurred sales expired at the end of April.

“Despite record low mortgage rates, housing is at risk of a double dip unless job growth strengthens soon,” said Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets.

Economists had had predicted that construction would fall to a rate of 580,000 and had projected that building permits would sink to a rate of 570,000, according to Thomson Reuters.

In a typical economic recovery, the construction sector provides much of the fuel. But not this time. While developers have cut back on construction and the number of new homes on the market has fallen dramatically, they still must compete against foreclosed homes selling at deep discounts.

Builders have been feeling increasingly pessimistic of late. The National Association of Home Builders said Monday that its monthly reading of builders’ sentiment about the housing market sank to 14 — the lowest level since March 2009. Readings below 50 indicate negative sentiment about the market.

Each new home built creates, on average, the equivalent of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes paid to local and federal authorities, according to the builders’ trade group. The impact appears in multiple industries, from makers of faucets and kitchen appliances to lumber yards.

The rate of home building is still up about 15% from the bottom in April 2009, though it’s down 76% from the last decade’s peak in January 2006.

New-home sales in May dropped 33% to the slowest pace in the 47 years records have been kept. The drop-off came immediately after the tax incentives to sign a contract on a home ended on April 30.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

Surrey housing complex becomes model for energy efficiency

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Greenbrook boasts largest solar power installation in Western Canada

Scott Simpson
Sun

Photograph by: Vancouver Sun Graphics, Vancouver Sun

A social housing complex in Surrey has become Western Canada’s largest solar energy development and model for sustainable housing.

A two-year, $21.8-million renovation of the 127-unit Greenbrook complex is expected to yield a 90-per-cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, provide a more comfortable living environment for residents — and extend the life of the government-owned town house complex by 30 years.

Housing and Social Development Minister Rich Coleman said that the 1974-built complex was in poor shape when the province “inherited” it from CMHC.

The foundations were leaking, basements were flooding, windows and walls were drafty, heating systems were aging, roofs needed replacing and the building envelopes needed to be sealed.

“When I looked at it initially, I wondered if it was worth saving,” Coleman said in a telephone interview on Monday. “In this particular case I thought it was, because in this particular site we had over 250-odd kids living there.

“We thought that if we could make it work for the neighbourhood and improve the product, we should.”

Now, he said, it’s a role model for the province’s Green Building Code.

“We can say go look at this. It’s actually working.”

On Saturday, Coleman joined residents at a celebration to mark the conclusion of a two-year upgrade of their homes.

High efficiency heat pumps have been installed which are expected to greatly reduce overall heating costs for the complex, and the pump systems have the added benefit of providing cool air in summer.

Tenants have the option of dialing up additional electrical heat, which will be billed individually, but it won’t often be necessary — the heat pumps are efficient down to minus-10 Celsius.

Coleman said residents expect their electricity bills will be substantially lower.

Other features include better perimeter drainage, insulation and building envelope upgrades, as well as solar electricity panels on the roofs of 11 of 28 townhouse blocks.

The solar panels have a rated electricity generating capacity 139 kilowatt hours — and are expected to provide enough power to replace 10 per cent of what the complex would otherwise pull off the BC Hydro grid.

In fact, BC Housing anticipates that the solar panels will be net producers of electricity at certain times — such as mid-day in summer — and will be selling that surplus power to BC Hydro.

Carmanah Technologies, based in Victoria, carried out the solar installation.

“The goal of this project was to replace 10 per cent of the development’s energy use with solar — to meet 10 per cent of the so-called ‘global’ energy needs,” said Richard Wayte, grid tie general manager for Carmanah.”

Carmanah has about 50 solar installations across Canada, including a recent contract with the town of Markham.

Wayte believes it’s just a matter of time before the private sector adopts solar technology in earnest. “The government has really done its job provincially, federally and municipally with a lot of pilot projects showing that systems can be built, that the technology is here, the infrastructure is here.

“Most of the things moving forward will be commercial and through private investment.”

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Shaw Tower’s $12.88 million mansion in the Vancouver sky

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Derick Penner
Sun

The location: The 41st floor of the Shaw Tower is a full-floor suite on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Which is more stunning, the interior art, or the exterior view? Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

A place to relax on the 41st floor of the Shaw Tower, which is on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

The lap of luxury on the 41st floor of the Shaw Tower, which is on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Entering the multi-million-dollar 41st floor suite in the Shaw Tower. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Office and media room details on the 41st floor of the Shaw Tower, a full-floor suite on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

One stunning view from the 41st floor of the Shaw Tower, on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Master-bath details in the 41st-floor suite in the Shaw Tower, now on sale for $12.88 million. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Workout room details in the 41st floor suite of the Shaw Tower. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Kitchen and dining room details in the 41st-floor suite in the Shaw Tower. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

Views from the 41st floor of the Shaw Tower are expansive. Photograph by: Handout, Randy and Stacy Raymond

The 41st floor of the Shaw Tower on Coal Harbour is a veritable “mansion in the sky” with 7,500 square feet with luxury touches such as Carrera marble in the master bath and 360-degree views.

It will soon test the top of Vancouver’s high-end market with a list price of $12.88 million.

Vancouver realtors Mark and Stacy Raymond are preparing the Shaw Tower listing at a time when the Metro Vancouver market is slowing, but they are hopeful they’ll catch a wave that is now running through the luxury market.

“This price, I believe, is absolutely bang on, in my opinion,” Mark Raymond said.

“It is clearly a very small, limited market, but right now I can say in the last four, five weeks I’ve really noticed an increase [downtown] in sales over $2 million.”

Stacy Raymond added that the owner (an unnamed Hollywood actor) has lowered the price. It was previously listed for $13.88 million, and realtors once tried to sell it for close to $16 million.

At $12.88 million, the Shaw property is the most expensive condo listed (by $80,000) through the Multiple Listing System and if sold, would be near the top of British Columbia’s list of all-time most expensive condo sales.

The record price for a single unit sold was just under $13.4 million for Penthouse 1 in the Shangri la building on West Georgia, which sold last August, according to a search of the B.C. Land Title Registry by Landcor Data Corp.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

You may not be tax-exempt

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

Taxman can sting strata corporations making cash on the side

Tony Gioventu
Province

Dear Condo Smarts : Our strata has always been under the impression that strata corporations were tax-exempt. As a result, we are not required to file tax returns and we don’t pay taxes or collect HST on strata fees. We have just received a notice that we are being audited by the CRA, and we’re not sure why or what we have to do. We are a residential highrise building in Burnaby with no commercial strata lots.

–Vicky M.

Dear Vicky: Strata corporations, for the most part, are classed as non-taxable corporations under tax laws, but not all strata corporations are tax-exempt. There are several types, usually non-residential, that are not necessarily tax-exempt. But there are even exceptions where a residential strata corporation is operating a commercial enterprise as part of the strata functions. If a condominium corporation carries on a business, any profits from that business must be included in its income and it will not be considered a non-profit corporation.

The following quote from the Canada Revenue Agency FORM IT-304R2 is very clear: “Paragraph 150(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act requires all corporations, including condominium corporations, to file an income tax return each year, even if they are exempt from paying tax under Part I. A residential condominium corporation that qualifies as a non-profit organization under paragraph 149(1)(l) is exempt from Part I tax on its taxable income, but is required to file Form T1044, Non-Profit Organization (NPO) Information Return, with its T2 tax return. Although it is a question of fact whether a particular condominium corporation qualifies for an exemption under paragraph 149(1) (l), most residential condominium corporations qualify as non-profit organizations within the meaning of this paragraph.”

Strata corporations are permitted to invest their reserve funds, and the interest earned on those funds for residential strata corporations is non-taxable; however, there are many strata corporations that have variations on income that transcend the intent of activities that are intended to generate profit. This may result in lower strata fees, which could be interpreted as profit.

Because strata corporations are permitted to charge user fees, some have been innovative with their options. For example, a user fee for additional parking in a building of $25 per month is unlikely to gain much attention, but a strata corporation that rents parking to the public as an enterprise for $300 a month can generate a significant amount of revenue. Both revenues must be reported in your annual income statement, and user fees are not necessarily tax-exempt.

Strata corporations are also permitted leases or licences over common areas. Again, this can generate substantial revenue. A series of rooftop communication towers can easily generate $100,000 a year or more.

If your strata has a long-planned and funded reserve fund study, or has conducted a major special levy, you are likely generating a significant amount of interest from the investments. That interest will generate a tax statement, and your strata corporation has to ensure it has filed an annual tax return with a yearend financial statement.

Contact your accountant or the CRA if you have any questions.

Tony Gioventu is executive director of the Condominium Home Owners’ Association. E-mail [email protected].

© Copyright (c) The Province

B.C. is homebuyers’ territory

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Active listings sit at the highest level since March 2009, economist says

Derrick Penner
Sun

Photograph by: Vancouver Sun Graphic, Vancouver Sun

When Maple Ridge’s Monika Novosadova went house hunting this spring, she faced an embarrassment of options, looking at 28 homes before putting an offer down on a three-bedroom, single-family home at the end of June.

And it was a shrewd offer since she faced a buyer’s market, like much of British Columbia in June, with rising inventories and declining sales putting home-hunters more in control.

“I felt I had cards in my hand because it was a buyer’s market,” Novosadova said in an interview. “And I felt fairly confident the price could be negotiated down.”

So the single mother wound up getting the house in a “perfect family neighbourhood” for $421,000, not the $429,900 it listed for.

Now she’s excitedly looking forward to moving into the home in September with her 10-year-old daughter. Her realtor Ron Antalek said Novosadova’s experience is typical.

“There’s not the necessity of multiple offers and competing bids,” Antalek said. “People are able to shop. They have time to compare.”

Across B.C. in June, realtors recorded 7,722 sales through the realtor-controlled Multiple Listing Service. That was down 22.5 per cent from the same month in 2009, the period when the biggest markets were just heating up again.

Active listings in inventory climbed almost 21 per cent to hit 59,232 units in June, which equalled a 9.3-month supply based on the pace of sales, said Cameron Muir, the B.C. Real Estate Association’s chief economist.

Muir said the key influences in June were simply an extension of the ones that have dampened demand since they took hold in April: tougher qualifying rules for some mortgages, particularly for first-time buyers and those seeking secondary suites, and a shift in long-term mortgage rates.

Plus, Muir added, the hot buying activity at the end of 2009 lured in many buyers who might have waited until now to purchase, which further reduces demand.

“I don’t know if there’s anything surprising about it, but we’ve seen a transition, in Vancouver in particular, from a seller’s market at the start of the year to a buyer’s market in the summer,” Muir said.

The experience, however, differs depending on which region homebuyers are looking in.

Victoria saw the biggest decline in June sales, down almost 36 per cent from June 2009, but it was closely followed by Metro Vancouver, where sales were down almost 30 per cent, and the region around Kelowna and Vernon, where sales were down almost 27 per cent.

As for whether B.C.’s markets are simply shifting balance or heading into a deeper correction, Muir believes buying activity is likely to increase again in the fall, but not enough to put dramatic pressure on prices.

The average B.C. home price, across all home types, hit $499,908 in June, up 8.2 per cent from the same month a year ago, but slightly off the average of $504,281 over the first six months of 2010.

Muir said home inventory levels sit at the highest they’ve been since March 2009. He said they are “at or near the peak as to where they’re going to go.”

Cameron McNeill, a new-project marketer with MAC Marketing Solutions, said that while sales have slowed, the decline is nothing like the collapse of sales that was experienced in late 2008 and early 2009.

“We’ve got 15, 17 projects open [for sales] and we’re doing deals on all of them,” Mc-Neill said.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Vancouver to consider modular housing for homeless, seniors

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Initial experiment could become permanent, mayor says

Jeff Lee
Sun

Modular buildings have advanced far beyond the days of mobile homes, to the point where they could become permanent housing.

Vancouver is considering allowing modular housing for everything from temporary lodging for the homeless to live-work studios for artists and even housing for seniors.

If the experiment is a success, the city could make such forms of housing permanent, Mayor Gregor Robertson said Thursday.

In the meantime, the city will consider making some unused public lands available for modular housing as it and the province work their way through a backlog to build 1,500 permanent social housing units on 14 city sites.

“For the time being it’s temporary housing. There would be a time limit. Five years is a probable ballpark,” the mayor told The Vancouver Sun’s editorial board.

“We’ve seen this form of housing used in other cities to fill a gap in the housing continuum and we have a couple of big gaps. This may get some vacant land into use.”

Vancouver doesn’t allow modular or portable buildings to be used for residences, in part because in the past they haven’t met the city’s building and zoning codes.

But the modular building industry has advanced so far beyond the days of mobile homes that Robertson thinks they could become a new permanent form if public demand and willingness to modify bylaws is there.

“The possibility exists. It would depend on the quality of housing, the acceptance of neighbourhoods and whether there is a strong case to be made for a more permanent status. But right now we’re looking at it as a stopgap form of housing.”

Olympic organizers used modular housing in Whistler to help supply enough beds for athletes and officials, and Whistler municipal officials relaxed laws to allow temporary containerized housing for employees of tourism-related businesses. Vanoc donated the units to the province after the Winter Games, and the 358 units are being converted to seniors housing around rural B.C.

Robertson’s comments came after Coun. Kerry Jang issued a motion for next Tuesday’s council meeting asking City Manager Penny Ballem to seek expressions of interest from modular housing companies to build demonstration projects.

Jang said he’s seen three types of units that could be suitable for people. He described them as: “Lego” building-block style, “Tinkertoy” add-on rooms style; and “plastic modular kit” style with buildable walls, floors and ceilings. Each has its own benefits, he said, but all of them must meet a livability test.

“The question I asked all the companies is, is this something that people would want to live in,” he said. “The answer came back yes.”

Companies would be expected to build the show units at their own cost without any commitment from the city to purchase units. However, winning ideas could be put in place as early as next year, Jang said.

Linus Lam, the executive director of Architecture for Humanity Vancouver, said people need to dispel the idea that modular housing is equivalent to mobile homes. “At one end of the spectrum you have emergency shelters and at the other end permanent housing. What we are talking about is in between, but doing something entirely different,” he said.

“These structures have the capacity to be permanent structures, but also have the capacity to be relocated. In terms of life cycle costs, that’s tremendous.”

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Home sales on downward slide

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Province

Home sales in B.C. tumbled 23 per cent last month, the B.C. Real Estate Association says.

Residential sales through the Multiple Listing Service in the province plunged to 7,722 in June from the same month last year, the association said Thursday.

Seasonally adjusted sales fell five per cent in June from May 2010, the association said. The average MLS home price rose eight per cent to $499,908 in June from the same month a year earlier.

“Market conditions have shifted from balanced conditions at the start of the year to a buyers’ market this summer,” association chief economist Cameron Muir said.

“Tighter credit conditions for homes with secondary suites and low-equity home buyers have moderated consumer demand,” he added.

Nationally, existing home sales continued their rapid decline last month, with 70 per cent of markets showing a drop in sales in June from May, says the Canadian Real Estate Association.

The Ottawa-based group, which has 100 boards across the country, said sales were off 8.2 per cent from a month ago on a seasonally adjusted basis. Toronto and Calgary led the decline.

Actual sales activity was down 19.7 per cent in June 2010 from a year ago when there were a record number of sales. Sales activity for the second quarter is actually down 2.8 per cent from a year ago but for the year to date sales are still up 13.6 per cent.

The number of Canadians putting their homes up for sale is declining, which should be good for the market. The number of new listings on the market in June dropped 6.8 per cent from May.

Price increases are also starting to slow. CREA said the national average sales price rose just 4.9 per cent from a year ago to $342,662.

The number of months of inventory in the market, which represents the number of months it would take to sell current inventories at the current rate of sales activity, is also rising fast. It was 5.7 months at the end of June 2010 nationally, up from 4.2 months a year ago.

“The housing market is becoming more challenging for sellers,” said Georges Pahud, CREA president. “Buyers are in less of a hurry.”

© Copyright (c) The Province

Bubble or not?

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Bryant Urstadt
Other

Download Document