Archive for April, 2015

New agent demand on sold data

Wednesday, April 8th, 2015

Olivia D’Orazio
Other

If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em – at least, that’s the sentiment of some agents threatening to become FSBO consultants if sold data isn’t better protected.  

“If all of the sales stats were made readily available for free, I would seriously consider starting my own FSBO company,” wrote Peter Barbati in the REP forum. “(I would) essentially use the sales stats and my experience to offer a ‘consulting service’ to sellers at a much lower final cost than traditional Realtors.”  

Barbati says he was writing tongue-in-cheek, but argues TREB’s potential inability to keep sold data private could push a lot of agents in that direction.  

“If they give away all of our tools, and now they’re taking our dues to help the competition,” he says. “(Starting a FSBO) would be one possible reaction. I don’t want to (do that). FSBOs aren’t regulated, they’re very dangerous to the consumer. They don’t have fiduciary duties, they don’t need to be insured. There is a lot of potential for damage to the buyer or seller.”  

That frustration is shared by many sales reps, who are increasingly anxious about TREB’s upcoming tribunal hearing with Canada’s Competition Bureau in May. The two organizations have been in and out of court since 2011, arguing about real estate sold data, which the Competition Bureau claims is anti-competitive.  

“We pay professional dues to ensure professional standards are maintained,” Barbati says, echoing the predominant Realtor train of thought. “But if the competition bureau does this, they should be fair across all industries across Canada. I think they’re picking on Realtors because we’re a disorganized lot.”

Copyright © 2015 Key Media Pty Ltd

Demand pushes key market to Vancouver-worthy heights

Tuesday, April 7th, 2015

Olivia D’Orazio
Other

Toronto’s real estate market during the month of March was impacted by the oldest story in the book: that of limited supply and skyrocketing demand.  

The Toronto Real Estate Board, which released the data, said the greatest indicator of the lack of inventory was a 5.5 per cent increase in new listings throughout the Greater Toronto Area during the month of March, which slowed from steeper climbs earlier this year. That, the board said, is a sign that the area’s limited supply is increasingly being scooped up by desperate buyers.  

“A substantial amount of pent-up demand remains in place, especially as it relates to low-rise market segments,” said Paul Etherington, TREB’s president. “This suggests that strong competition between buyers, which has fuelled strong price growth so far this year, will continue to be experienced throughout the spring.”  

Sales, too, were up in the GTA, rising 11 per cent year-over-year to 8,940 transactions in March. Etherington said that was likely a result of the Bank of Canada’s decision to lower the benchmark rate in January.  

“Home sales increased compared to last year as the cost of home ownership remained affordable, with lower interest rates going a long way to mitigate the effect of rising home prices,” Etherington said.  

However, as buyers become increasingly desperate to get into the detached market, particularly in the City of Toronto, they are inadvertently driving up the price. In Toronto the average price of a single-family home rose almost 16 per cent from the year-ago period to more than $1.04 million.  

“It is clear that seller’s market conditions in many parts of the GTA are driving price growth,” said Jason Mercer, TREB’s director of market analysis. “However, looking at the detached market segment in the City of Toronto in particular, growth in the average selling price outstripped growth in the MLS HPI. This points to the fact that the mix of detached homes sold this year compared to last has shifted towards more expensive properties.”  

Total sales in the city proper were up 7.6 per cent year-over-year at 3,196 transactions, mainly from the condo market, which posted a 13.5 per cent increase in sales over the year-ago period. Average price across all property types was up 9.6 per cent in Toronto at $655,067.

Copyright © 2015 Key Media Pty Ltd

 

Fresh warning bells sounded over Vancouver’s hot housing market

Sunday, April 5th, 2015

Vancouver house prices to hit $4.4 million

Other

Soaring real estate prices have been the equivalent of winning the lottery for thousands of people who own single-family detached homes in Vancouver.

The average price of new and existing detached houses sold within the city of Vancouver has topped $1.9-million. An eye-popping projection by Vancouver City Savings Credit Union calls for the average detached price within Vancouver’s city limits to skyrocket to $4.4-million in 2030, if pricing trends of recent years continue unabated.

Real estate industry officials say the price projection is theoretical and fantastical, but Vancity said its outlook is meant to sound the alarm on an already expensive market becoming even more mind-boggling.

A decade ago, housing experts would have been incredulous at what has transpired. The average price for new and existing detached properties sold within the city of Vancouver reached $1,914,069 last year, up 173 per cent from $701,094 in 2005, according to data released by Vancity to The Globe and Mail.

Royal LePage real estate agent Karin Morris got a first-hand look at the frenzied market during a recent two-hour open house in the upscale Point Grey neighbourhood on Vancouver’s west side. A professional couple paid $488,000 for the detached home in 2000.

The couple, who now live in California, kept the home as an investment until listing it at 3 p.m. on March 25. An offer emerged two hours later at their asking price of $2.288-million.

But the couple, in an interview Saturday outside the home during their visit to Vancouver, recalled how patience would be a virtue.

During the open house on March 29, Ms. Morris exhausted all of the 28 feature sheets she printed in anticipation of a typical turnout. By the end of the afternoon, more than 100 people toured the 52-year-old bungalow.

Ms. Morris began accepting bids one day after the open house, attracting 15 offers – none of them subject to financing.

“It has gone berserk,” she said. “Four of the offers were really close.”

The winning bid turned out to be $2.48-million, or nearly $2-million higher than the selling price 15 years ago. The house sold for $192,000 above the asking price of $2.288-million. The number eight, considered lucky in Chinese culture, is a common sight in Vancouver in real estate pricing for listings and sales.

Clamouring over the modest bungalow is just the latest example of bidding wars breaking out amid surging demand for detached homes.

The Point Grey buyers are a family from China, said their agent, Shino Zhang of Pacific Place-Arc Realty Ltd. Through their agent, the purchasers asked not to be identified.

Darcy McLeod, president of the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver, plays down the impact of offshore buyers, saying such sales tend to be focused on higher-end listings on Vancouver’s west side. “It doesn’t apply to every neighbourhood,” he said.

Low mortgage rates, a limited land base and new residents moving to B.C. from overseas and other provinces all contribute to the housing boom. “It creates the perfect storm for a bit of a frenzy for home buyers,” Mr. McLeod said.

The bungalow sellers, who asked not to be named, are thrilled at their good fortune after renting out the house since 2000. They originally had thoughts of retiring in Vancouver because the husband is Canadian, but their careers took them to California, where they have set down roots.

“We were, frankly, staggered at the response our house generated,” the American wife said in an e-mail.

The 2,164-square-foot home is in good condition, but is a tear-down candidate by Vancouver standards because it could be replaced with a larger new house. The main attraction in the listing is the majestic view through the front window of the mountains and downtown skyline.

The buyers’ intent for now is to keep the home. The house itself was assessed at only $35,800 last July, while the land value was pegged at slightly above $2-million. Assessed land values, however, are quickly outdated due to the booming housing market.

Last month, a Vancity report said the average price for all housing types within Vancouver could theoretically exceed $2.1-million in 2030, based on recent pricing growth. For detached homes, condos and townhouses within Vancouver’s city limits, the average price climbed 126 per cent over the past decade – from $449,953 in 2005 to $1,018,188 last year, Vancity said.

Vancity commissioned Central 1 Credit Union senior economist Bryan Yu and chief economist Helmut Pastrick to compile and refine statistics from Landcor Data Corp., focusing on land title transfers arising from arm’s-length transactions. Landcor tracks real estate data for new and existing properties.

In Greater Vancouver, including suburbs such as Richmond and Burnaby, the average price for resale detached homes set a record last month of more than $1.4-million, up 16.2 per cent from March, 2014. Properties don’t sit long on the market. It took an average of 33 days to sell an existing detached home in March, compared with 42 days in the same month in 2014.

Canada’s most expensive housing market has become a city of real estate millionaires.

A study by Andrew Yan, an urban planner with Bing Thom Architects, found that 66 per cent of the nearly 68,600 detached properties within the city of Vancouver were conservatively assessed at $1-million or higher last July.

Many younger consumers are looking at resale condos, which had an average price of $465,225 last month in Greater Vancouver.

“First-time buyers are going to have to accept smaller spaces and take advantage of outdoor public amenities,” said Andy Broderick, Vancity’s vice-president of community investment. “It’s going to get tougher and tougher.”

© Copyright 2015 The Globe and Mail Inc.

RE/MAX Now More than 100,000 Agents Strong

Thursday, April 2nd, 2015

Agent-Centric Model and Recovering Market Attract Thousands

Other

DENVER – The global real estate franchisor, RE/MAX (NYSE:RMAX) now counts over 100,000 agents in its network. Ending 2014 with 98,010 agents worldwide, RE/MAX attracted more than 2,000 agents in just the first few months of 2015 to reach this significant milestone.   “As our agent count grew over the last three years, we knew that the 100,000 threshold would be crossed very soon,” said Dave Liniger, CEO, Chairman of the Board and Co-Founder of RE/MAX, LLC. “Our agent-centric business model has attracted top producers for 42 years. It’s nice to have such large numbers, but we’re most proud of the quality agents who call RE/MAX home.”      RE/MAX agent growth picked up steam in 2015 and as of April 1 had risen 2.1%, after increasing 5.1% in all of 2014. RE/MAX continues its trend of agent growth while the National Association of Realtors reported February home sales at levels 4.7% higher than one year ago.   “In an improving market, the most productive agents will want to affiliate with a recognized brand that supports their efforts with valuable resources and innovative technology tools,” Liniger added.   The best agents seek out organizations that can help them succeed in a competitive environment. RE/MAX provides a comprehensive training platform, RE/MAX University, that is available 24/7 on-demand anywhere in the world. RU has been recognized with numerous training and video awards.   And since 2006, RE/MAX has provided over 14 million online leads to its agents without a referral fee. Other services include a creative advertising campaign and the RE/MAX Design Center, an online marketing site where agents can create customized materials using professionally designed templates.   RE/MAX agents consistently rank among the most productive in the industry. In the United States, RE/MAX agents averaged 15.6 years of real estate experience and 16.0 transaction sides in 2014.   ­­Selling five Master Franchises in 2014, RE/MAX reached around the world to nearly 100 countries. No other real estate brand can match this global footprint. It remains true that nobody in the world sells more real estate than RE/MAX.

#  #  #

  About the RE/MAX Network: RE/MAX was founded in 1973 by Dave and Gail Liniger, with an innovative, entrepreneurial culture affording its agents and franchisees the flexibility to operate their businesses with great independence.   Over 100,000 agents provide RE/MAX a global reach of nearly 100 countries. Nobody sells more real estate than RE/MAX.   RE/MAX, LLC, one of the world’s leading franchisors of real estate brokerage services, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RMCO, LLC, which is controlled and managed by RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:RMAX).   With a passion for the communities in which its agents live and work, RE/MAX is proud to have raised more than $150 million for Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals® and other charities.   For more information about RE/MAX, to search home listings or find an agent in your community, please visit www.remax.com.

For the latest news about RE/MAX, please visit   www.remax.com/newsroom.

© 2012 RE/MAX, LLC.

Vancouver sees sharp increase in March sales

Thursday, April 2nd, 2015

Jamie Henry
Other

Vancouver’s residential property market was busy in March with MLS sales up 32.6 per cent from February and 53.7 per cent from March last year. The total number of sales recorded was 4,060. Data from the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver also reveals that last month’s total sales figure was 26.8 per cent above the 10-year average. The board’s president Darcy McLeod says that there is strong competition with multiple offers, which is great news for sellers: “The number of homes for sale today is below what’s typical for this time of year. If you’ve been considering putting your property on the market, these market conditions indicate that now may be a good time to list.” That said, the number of listings was 13 per cent higher in March this year than the same month last year and new listings were up 4.7 per cent. All property types saw large increases in sales year-over-year: apartments up 47.1 per cent, detached homes up 53.3 per cent and attached properties up 72.3 per cent. McLeod added that buyers are acting fast: “For sellers, this means that it’s taking less time, on average, for your home to sell if you have it priced correctly for today’s market.”

Victoria Real Estate Board March 2015 Stats

Wednesday, April 1st, 2015

Other

Download Document

DEALING WITH HERITAGE SITES

Wednesday, April 1st, 2015

Other

How many licensees are aware that tThe Heritage Conservation Act (HCA), which replaced the Archeological and Historic Sites Protection Act (the Act) in 1977, extends the legislated protection of archeological sites on Crown lands, to archeological sites on private property, without requiring formal designation or notice being registered on title? An archeological site by definition is a location where there is evidence of past human activity, and may include shell middens, remains of ancient houses, campsites, ancient stone carvings or other heritage objects.

Land that has been designated as heritage property is clearly protected under the HCA, but so is land falling within the definition of heritage site. A heritage site is any land, whether designated or not, that has “heritage value” to British Columbia, a community or an aboriginal people. This even includes land covered by water. Heritage value means the historical, cultural, aesthetic, scientific or educational worth or usefulness of a site or object. The consequences of licensees not being aware of the protection afforded to archeologically sensitive land can by significant. Consider the following example:

A buyer locates a beautiful piece of land listed for sale in Northern BC adjacent to a pristine lake. The land appears perfectly suitable for the buyer’s dream of constructing a multi-unit residential property. Unbeknownst to the buyer, his licensee, the seller and his licensee, archeological research conducted in the 1970’s under the Act generated a report identifying the property as an archeological site. The seller, who had inherited the property, never received the report, although he had found artifacts on the property. The title search does not reveal a notice that the property is designated heritage property.

The buyer decides to make an offer to buy the property, subject to the possibility of rezoning the property to accommodate his development plans. The buyer contacts the local authority, which provides verbal assurance that the buyer’s rezoning application will be favourably received. The buyer removes his subject condition based upon that assurance and completes the purchase.

Subsequently, in the course of seeking approval to rezone the property, the buyer learns that the property is protected by the HCA. The buyer then spends thousands of dollars obtaining an archeological impact assessment required for his application for a site alteration permit and based upon the report, no permit is issued and the rezoning is not approved.

The result? The buyer is out of pocket not only for the costs associated with the archeological impact assessment and rezoning application, but also the cost of the land, legal fees and other development costs. The value of the land may also have diminished as a result of the development restrictions.

The outcome? Likely a lawsuit against:

a)

The buyer’s licensee and his/her brokerage for failing to contact, or recommend that the buyer contact, the Archeological Branch;2

b)

The seller’s licensee and his/her brokerage for not investigating and ascertaining whether the property was protected under the HCA;

c)

The seller for not disclosing that the property had archeological significance; and/or

d)

The local authority for not contacting the Archeological Branch before giving informal approval to the developer’s zoning application.

Licensees should be familiar with archeologically sensitive areas in the communities in which they work and be aware of the silent arm of the HCA and its effect on the use, development and/or value of any property it protects. To avoid claims or professional conduct complaints relating to archeological sites, licensees should:

  • Check to see if property is listed on municipal or provincial heritage registers;
  • Contact the Archeological Branch or submit a BC Archeological Site Data Request Form3 to the Branch to determine if the property is protected; or
  • Shift that responsibility to their client (in writing).

Licensees should also review the Real Estate Council of British Columbia’s Professional Standards Manual section on heritage properties4 and become familiar with the subject clauses set out therein.

Jennifer Clee B.A., LL.B.

 

1.

R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 187.

 

2.

Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, www.for.gov.bc.ca/archaeology.

 

3.

www.archdatarequest.nrs.gov.bc.ca.

 

4.

www.recbc.ca/psm/heritage-conservation-act.

Copyright © British Columbia Real Estate Association
1420 – 701 Georgia Street West
PO Box 10123, Pacific Centre
Vancouver, BC  V7Y 1C6
Phone 604.683.7702
Fax 604.683.8601
www.bcrea.bc.ca
[email protected]

 

Oil slump makes Canadian REITs a bargain #LesTwarog

Wednesday, April 1st, 2015

Jordan Maxwell
Other

Property investors seeking a bargain may want to turn to Canada, where real estate investment trusts are the cheapest relative to their U.S. peers since the financial crisis. According to BNN.ca, stockholders are paying 13 times a Canadian REIT’s funds from operations to own shares in 51 companies, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Shareholders in 210 U.S. REITs forked over 20 times the cash-flow measure at the end of last year. The difference between the two ratios is the widest since 2009. “It’s a good time to invest in Canadian REITs,” said Anil Tahiliani, who manages about $1.1 billion, at McLean & Partners Wealth Management Ltd. and owns the stocks. “They’re partly reflecting concerns about the Canadian economy, housing and the effect of low oil. But we’re going to be in a low-interest-rate environment, and Canada is still better off. Rates aren’t as likely to go up in Canada as in the U.S.” Real estate values north of the 49th parallel have fallen as oil prices drop by half and the Canadian dollar slides. That’s lowered the price of Canadian REITs, and pushed their yields more than two percentage points above U.S. REITs.

Copyright © 2015 Key Media Pty Ltd

New rental units in Edmonton to increase vacancy rate #LesTwarog

Wednesday, April 1st, 2015

Jamie Henry
Other

Lower immigration from other countries and fewer Canadians moving to Alberta from other provinces will play a part in rising condo rental vacancies in Edmonton this year. A report from Colliers International said there are 10,000 new condo units due for completion this year and they will provide new choices for renters in a market where much of the supply was built in the 1960’s. However, although the firm said that Edmonton is still a solid rental market, it questioned how many of the new properties will be absorbed into the market.  

Copyright © 2015 Key Media Pty Ltd

Could your flyers get your license revoked? #LesTwarog

Wednesday, April 1st, 2015

Olivia D’Orazio
Other

If you’re looking for those guilty of breaking TREB’s new rules on sharing sold-data, you need look no further than a growing number of agent flyers.

“You’re not allowed to disclose the price,” says Ken Ramsay, an agent in Toronto who has seen this kind of illegal marketing in his own neighbourhood. “I concentrate online now, but I’ve had to take sold listings off my site.”  

Like Ramsay, fewer agents are using the marketing technique, but many still distribute flyers throughout a target neighbourhood, boasting the selling prices of various properties in the area. These flyers, intended to entice potential sellers, are in violation of the Toronto Real Estate Board’s rules regarding published sold data.  

“I started weeding down (on flyering) because I found it ineffective compared to other ways of marketing, such as the Internet,” says Ira Jelinek, a Toronto-based agent. “You don’t give out all the information, so you don’t put the sale price, and gives the neighbours a reason to call you.”  

Jelinek and Ramsay agree that releasing sold data to the neighbourhood could be embarrassing for the sellers.  

“I have some clients who were curious to see what the neighbour’s house sold for but the seller might want to keep it private,” Ramsay says. “If your house sold for a crazy high number or a low number, it could be embarrassing (to have that broadcast).”  

The Competition Bureau claims the privatization of sold data is anti-competitive on TREB’s part, and the Bureau and the Board have been in and out of hearings since 2011. At the latest hearing in May, TREB will argue that the data should be kept private since its membership pays for the collection and the organization of the information by way of their fees.  

“We shouldn’t have to give (sold data) away to the public for free,” says Elaine Smallwood, a 25-year real estate veteran in Ottawa. “We have invested in this – it’s a business investment. To be told this isn’t yours, it belongs to the public, I believe the boards need to stand up for our rights, and that isn’t what’s going on.”  

While the debate over making sold data public is far from over – the Toronto board will sit before a tribunal in May to continue conversations with the country’s competition bureau – many agents see the value in this type of marketing. However, many more are not willing to risk their licenses, and by extension, their livelihoods.  

“(Breaking the rules) could hurt you,” Jelinek says. “Of course it’s not worth the trade-off.”

Copyright © 2015 Key Media Pty Ltd