Archive for July, 2019

Fed announces interest rate decision

Wednesday, July 31st, 2019

The Federal Reserve reduced interest rates


The Federal Reserve reduced interest rates for the first time since the financial crisis and hinted it may cut again this year to insulate the record-long U.S. economic expansion from slowing global growth.

Central bankers voted, with two officials dissenting, to lower the target range for the benchmark rate by a quarter-percentage point to 2%-2.25%. The shift was predicted by most investors and economists, yet will disappoint President Donald Trump, who tweeted on Tuesday he wanted a “large cut.’’

“In light of the implications of global developments for the economic outlook as well as muted inflation pressures, the committee decided to lower’’ rates, the Federal Open Market Committee, led by Jerome Powell, said in a statement following a two-day meeting in Washington. It also noted that “uncertainties” about the economic outlook remain.

Officials also stopped shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet effective Aug. 1, ending a process that very modestly tightens monetary policy and was previously scheduled to come to a close at the end of September.

Policy makers appeared open to another cut as early as September when they next convene, while sticking with wording in their statement that preserves their options.

“As the committee contemplates the future path of the target range for the federal funds rate, it will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook and will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion,” they said.

Kansas City Fed President Esther George and Boston’s Eric Rosengren voted against the cut. The statement said they “preferred at this meeting to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate.” It was the first time since Powell took over as chairman in February 2018 that two policy makers dissented.

Investors had forecast the Fed to continue easing monetary policy this year, with futures pricing the key rate to fall about another half-point by January. U.S. stocks rose to a record last week in anticipation of easier money, while the yield on two-year Treasuries has undershot 2% since May.

While the domestic economy has performed relatively well, the Fed cut amid concern that softness abroad threatens the decade- long U.S. expansion. Trump’s trade war with China is hurting foreign demand. Data released earlier Wednesday showed the pace of quarter-over-quarter growth in the euro area slowed by half in the latest three months to 0.2%.

In the U.S., after growing 2.5% last year, fuelled by now-fading tax cuts and higher government spending, the economy expanded at a 2.1% annualized pace in the second quarter. The trade dispute was blamed for a manufacturing slowdown and the first drop in business investment since 2016.

In their assessment of the US economy, officials made only minor changes to their statement language.

Powell has repeatedly said the Fed’s “overarching goal’’ is to keep growth going. Acting now, when the central bank has less room to pare rates than in past downturns, is partly aimed at getting ahead of any potential slump.

Lacklustre inflation also offered the Fed space and reason to ease. Its preferred price gauge, excluding food and energy, rose 1.6% in June from a year earlier and hasn’t met the Fed’s 2% target this year.

Trump is unlikely to be satisfied as he puts the economy at the heart of his re-election bid. He has broken with convention and undermined the Fed’s political independence by lobbying it to loosen policy and publicly questioning his nomination of Powell as chairman.

At his press conference, Powell will almost certainly be asked if the Fed buckled to that pressure. He may also be quizzed on whether the Fed, if requested, would join the U.S. Treasury in any effort to weaken the dollar given Trump’s complaints about the currency’s value.

Limited Scope

While Trump and some investors wanted the Fed to be more aggressive, its scope for doing so is limited. Stocks are high, unemployment is around the lowest in a half-century and consumers continue to spend. At the same time, a measure of business in the Chicago region fell this month to the lowest since late 2015.

The rate reduction was the first since December 2008 when the Fed dropped its benchmark effectively to zero as it battled recession and financial crisis. It began raising borrowing costs in December 2015, doing so another eight times. Officials indicated as recently as December they intended to continue to hike this year.

They dumped that plan in January as financial markets fretted monetary policy had become too restrictive.

Fellow central banks are set to follow the Fed. Those in India, South Africa and Australia are among those to have cut this year. The European Central Bank has indicated it will do so in September.

A worry for policy makers is that a decade of easy money leaves them short of ammunition for fighting a serious downturn. That likely means governments will face demands to do more if economies keep struggling.

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Three Rs that struggling companies can use to put themselves on the comeback trail

Wednesday, July 31st, 2019

Three steps that can put struggling companies on the comeback trail

Martin Pelletier
The Vancouver Sun

Everyone loves a good comeback story, in which someone who was once mighty not only survives trials and tribulations but comes out stronger on the other side.

In today’s highly disruptive world, there are plenty of companies that have gone from top of the food chain to becoming prey themselves, but not many that have clawed their way back.

Take Sears, for example.

Though it was the Amazon of its day, with its popular catalogues and mail-order delivery system, over time it morphed into a big box store company and became overly complacent. Meanwhile, competitors such as Walmart and Amazon embraced the shift online.

Like many companies, Sears reacted not by acknowledging the changing landscape, but by doubling down on an existing strategy. Instead of reducing its store count and building out and improving its online offerings, it spent more money on the “store-within-a-store” approach and merging with other broken companies, such as Kmart.

It is an important lesson not only for companies in trouble but also for investors wondering if the broken story they own will be able to return to former glory.

For companies looking to right the ship, the following three steps are key.


The first step is a critical one because it acknowledges there is a serious problem that isn’t being dealt with. While it sounds simple, it can be a very difficult thing in practice as it means undertaking some honest self-reflection. It also helps to distinguish between root causes and secondary issues, ensuring that improvements won’t just be temporary.

In 2012, Best Buy was struggling to grow both revenue and profits, which was reflected in its struggling share price. The problem was that employee morale fell to new lows at the same time that their product and service offerings were unable to compete with lower-cost online competitors.  So the company decided to take radical steps and refocus itself via the rollout of its Renew Blue strategy, a well-defined five-stage plan to stabilize and then increase comparable same-store sales and operating margins. This included the introduction of a price-matching strategy; the conversion of stores into both warehouses and pickup locations, which greatly improved delivery times for online shoppers; an expansion of their product offerings within their store locations; and partnerships with electronics providers to exclusively showcase new technologies. Suddenly Best Buy became an innovative and exciting place to work and employee morale quickly recovered — as did its share price.


A restructuring gives the company the opportunity to replace those shareholders who are not willing to support the company’s refocus. It is an important process to go through as capital partners need to be aligned with management and the plan about to be implemented.

In the case of Best Buy, a new CEO was hired along with other senior management changes, stores were shut down, unproductive regions were exited and internal costs were cut.


Putting a plan into action also requires the right people in the right places. Who gets brought in depends on whether the culture of the organization needs to be completely gutted or if a few tweaks will suffice.

For example, in a situation of a complete reorganization, it may be better to change out entire teams under divisional leaders, especially if there is complacency and little buy-in with the new corporate direction among existing staff. To help with the process, change is better the sooner it happens and the more transparent it is.

Finally, the larger the company, the more difficult it will be to change its ways — but it’s never impossible.

For investors, be sure to own those businesses who have their ears to the ground and who are willing to adapt to the new competitive environment.

© 2019 Financial Post

2019 Mid-Year Commercial Real Estate Update

Wednesday, July 31st, 2019

How has Commercial Real Estate Performed in the First Half of 2019, and What to Expect in the Second Half and Beyond:


  • The trade war between China and the United States is slowing the global economy, creating global uncertainty, and impacting Canada directly in regards to trade with China. 
  • With the Canadian dollar on the rise, Canadian exports, including oil, will be under pressure. Ultimately, this will impact economic growth later this year. 
  • Although the Trans Mountain Pipeline has now been approved, it will take time to complete construction and to ultimately benefit the oil sector in Alberta. Until then, they will have to make do with efficiencies being achieved on existing pipelines.  
  • Interest rates and debt servicing costs are no longer on the rise, however, high debt will numb the impact of any Bank of Canada rate cut later this year as they try to get Canadian consumers to spend in order to keep the economy from slowing.


Read Full Report

Will B.C.’s commercial real estate prices follow residential decline?

Wednesday, July 31st, 2019

Price index trend lines have tended to mirror each other, but have recently diverged

Jim Costello
Western Investor

Home prices have been in a sharp retreat in Metro Vancouver, Canada’s second largest investment market, ever since the British Columbia government introduced a foreign buyer tax in mid-2016. The concern for some is that commercial property prices will be pulled down by the residential sector. Recent price history suggests that won’t necessarily be the case, however.

When I visited Vancouver earlier this year, market participants seemed to be waiting for the next shoe to drop. With single-family homes and commercial properties competing for land, the thinking is that the decline in residential prices will bring down land values, and in turn bring down commercial property prices to the same degree as residential assets.

Historically, these price series had moved together. From 2005 to 2014 each exhibited a six per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR) with only a few bumps and differences between the series over time.

This link lends credence to the argument that a transmission vehicle such as land prices might translate the decline in single family prices over to the commercial sector, forcing these price series to converge once again.

The convergence evident over the longer history is not true of recent trends, however:

  • Commercial property prices did not participate in the run-up of prices to the same degree as the residential sector. Given the intense interest by cross-border buyers for residential assets in Vancouver, single family home prices grew at a faster pace than commercial properties from 2014 to 2017. The Canadian Real Estate Association MLS® HPI for Vancouver single family assets grew at a 17 per cent CAGR from 2014 to 2017. A custom Real Capital Analytics (RCA) commercial property price indicator for British Columbia grew at only an 11 per cent CAGR over the same time period. This CAGR was sizeable and put B.C. in the same league as other global technology hubs like San Francisco, but prices for the residential sector moved far ahead of commercial properties.
  • When the B.C. government introduced the foreign buyers tax, residential property prices slid as a pool of buyers left the market, deterred by the tax on purchase prices (introduced at 15 per cent and since raised to 20 per cent). From January 2018 to May 2019, the Vancouver single family price index has fallen a cumulative 14 per cent. (Growth in single family home prices across Canada have been stalling too, in part because of costs related to risk management for residential mortgages.) Over the same time frame, commercial property prices for B.C. have climbed a cumulative seven per cent.

Commercial property prices in B.C. have fallen slightly in 2019 – down a cumulative one per cent into May from the end of 2018. This decline came at a time when the yield on the 10-year benchmark bond in Canada fell from 2.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent which, when combined with record low commercial property vacancy in Vancouver, should shore up the value of the income streams from these commercial assets.

Yes, prices are down slightly, but a one per cent decline is indicative of flat prices. Unless an owner is forced to sell assets in a distressed situation, there just is not the incentive to cut sale prices the same way for commercial assets as there is in the residential sector. (It should be noted that the sale of the Bentall Centre portfolio in 2016 did not enter into the construction of the RCA B.C. commercial property price indicator, nor will its announced sale in Q2 2019 enter the data set.)

If owners of commercial assets are unwilling to sell, commercial property prices can remain flat or even grow in line with the favorable income trends for assets in the region. Such positive trends could happen even as residential prices slowly recover from the introduction of the foreign buyer tax. Convergence in price trends might not mean commercial prices falling off a cliff, but instead residential prices facing a steady climb in the years ahead.

Copyright © Western Investor

Marpole housing co-op partners with developer on large rental project

Tuesday, July 30th, 2019

Ashley-Mar Housing Co-operative and Intracorp Homes involved in proposal for three-tower development

Naoibh O’Connor
Vancouver Courier

Ashley-Mar Housing Co-operative and Intracorp Homes have partnered on a proposal for a three-tower development on the co-op’s acre-and-a-half site between Cambie and Ash streets. The property, which includes two parcels separated by a lane, is located just south of Marine Drive, not far from Marine Gateway and the Canada Line station.

A rezoning application for the land at 8460 Ash St. and 8495 Cambie St. was filed recently.

If the application is approved, Ashley-Mar’s existing 54 two-storey co-op townhome units would be replaced, and another 71 added, for a total of 125 units in a 14-storey non-market building. The other two buildings — one 24 and the other 27 storeys — would provide 457 market rentals units, with the entire project producing a total of 582 units. Some commercial space is included in the development. 


Evan Allegretto, Intracorp’s senior vice president of development, thinks it may be the first partnership between a developer and a co-op where funding for the majority of costs is through a rental rather than a condo project.

“It’s a good example of [how] the private sector development community can work with a non-market group to try to create a development that hopefully matches council’s objectives on [a] transit [line],” he said. “It’s the first, essentially co-op and rental-only project on transit at this scale. The co-op, if they wanted to, could just renew their stock today. They could take out a new mortgage to renew their housing. They came forward and wanted to increase the density. It was their decision.”

An earlier proposal floated late last year envisioned a development that included two 18-storey market condo buildings, with a 15-storey building to house the 54 co-op replacement units and additional affordable housing units, but city staff advised them to pursue a rental application while maintaining the amount of non-market housing.

“We’ve used every lever we can, from incentives to other policy directives that we could use, to make the project feasible. The resulting density and tower heights is the result [required] to fund the non-market building,” Allegretto said.

“…It’s very hard to get the economics to work to support a large non-market building like the one that we’re proposing on site because the concrete construction costs are quite high right now.”

The co-op, which has been working with Intracorp to develop the project for about three-and-a-half years, was established in the 1980s. Although the mortgage was paid off recently, redevelopment plans means the co-op will still have to take on another small mortgage.

Co-op spokesperson Ryuji Kita said members decided to rebuild because the homes were getting older, amenities were lacking and taxes were going up.

“And we thought it was in our best interest to seek out a different style of building,” he said.

Some members were initially concerned because the layout will be different, with units in a taller building rather in a townhouse format like what exists now. 

“But, all in all, right now everyone’s on board,” Kita said. 

Allegretto maintains it’s a good location for the development because it’s south of Marine Drive. The land south of the site is all industrial, so the impact to the neighbourhood, in his opinion, is minimized.

If council approves the development, and the process is “extremely smooth,” construction could start in early 2021. It would take two and a half to three years to complete. The co-op building would be finished first.

The tenant relocation plan that’s being proposed would allow existing co-op members to move anywhere and Intracorp would top up their rent to an agreed-upon threshold. They would be able to return to similar units in the new development at their same rates.

“So there’s zero displacement and everyone there is treated really well,” Allegretto said.

Kita said having to relocate during construction worried some members, especially those with children who want to remain in the same school catchment.

“There were a lot of questions but Intracorp is working well with us. They’ve got a third party that’s going to come an interview all of us and make sure we’re all located in an area that works well,” he said.

Kita said the membership is also working on how to sustain a community feel in a different style of building. That will include having an amenity room where members can gather.

© 2019 Vancouver Courier

How Much Does It Cost to Sell a House (Or Apartment)?

Tuesday, July 30th, 2019

A guide to selling a house


The old adage that you need to spend money to make money could not be more accurate when talking about the costs of selling a house (or apartment). There will be agents’ fees, marketing expenses, and conveyancing costs to consider, and depending on how long it takes for your property to sell, these figures can be quite significant. You are not the only person looking to sell property, so the competition also needs to be considered.

Still, it’s a necessary evil for a much greater gain, so rather than be deterred, be informed and answer the question “how much does it cost to sell a house (or apartment)?” with this guide compiled by

1. It starts with the right agent

The main reason why you should be aware of the costs involved in selling a property is to ensure that the exercise will provide the financial gain you are expecting. The three most significant expenses you will need to consider are

  1. Conveyancing
  2. Marketing
  3. Agent’s fee/commission

Choosing the right agent can be a crucial driver in the success of your sale, and this is not a decision that should be made on cost alone. The best candidate to represent you should have a proven track record of successful sales and happy clients as opposed to just the lowest fees.

Let’s look at the three main costs of selling a house, why they exist, and what you should prepare for.

2. Conveyancing fees

Conveyancing entails the legal transfer of ownership for your property and is a required part of every real estate purchase. To perform this correctly, you will need licensed conveyancers and solicitors, and it is in your best interest to choose someone local. 

A local solicitor has local knowledge, which can be invaluable when it comes to things like special conditions or information specific to a particular area. Conveyancing costs can land anywhere in the ballpark of $800 to $2000.

3. Marketing costs

The size of your marketing budget has a direct correlation to how effective and speedy your sale will be. There is often a lot of competition in the housing market, so ensuring that your property stands out above the crowd is crucial.

The cost of marketing your property falls solely on you. It is common that your agent will recommend a particular marketing campaign, but you are able to tweak this as you see fit. We strongly recommend listening to the agent, especially if you have followed the first point and picked them for their knowledge and expertise, but some of the common marketing strategies you may want to consider can include:

  • A ‘For Sale’ board in front of the house
  • A listing on
  • Professional photography
  • A clear floor plan
  • Engaging copywriting
  • Various press advertising

You can also make use of various social media or free listing websites to increase your reach without having to add more to the marketing budget. For the most part, however, the size of your marketing budget determines the strength of your sales campaign.

A marketing campaign can cost anywhere between $4000 to $10,000 on average.

4. Agents’ fees

When deciding on your real estate agent, it is most common for there to be two options for how they charge their fee:

  • A flat fee

This will be a fixed fee agreed upon between you and the agent regardless of what your property sells for

  • The percentage of sale fee

As the name suggests, the agent will receive a certain percentage of the final sale price, often ranging from 1% to 3% depending on property value and competition

When deciding between these two options, you will need to keep in mind that while a fixed fee locks in your cost, an agent may work harder to get the best sale price if working for commission. 

In some cases, vendors agree to incentive bonuses for the agent. This is usually a percentage-based bonus that is paid if the sale price is higher than the agreed reserve. It is common for this to be around 10% of the amount over the reserve.

Regardless of which option you take, it is vital to discuss and agree to all fees before signing anything with the agent.

5. Other fees

Outside of the main three costs, you will need to consider any applicable lender fees if you have a mortgage on the property you are selling. When paying off your remaining mortgage after the sale of your property, you will likely need to pay a discharge or early exit fee. This varies significantly by a financial institution and was probably explained to you when you first signed for the loan.

In some cases, particularly if taking out a new loan on a new property with the same institution, you can negotiate a waiver of this fee. It is also important to note that the discharge process can take anywhere between 14 and 21 days.

Maximising your sale price

You may wish to outlay some extra funds on maintenance or professional styling to help increase the attraction and saleability of the property. Keep in mind that you are trying to convince a potential buyer walking into your house that they love it and could comfortably live there. Consider the things people may look for in a new home. Styling makes the property as appealing as possible, to help the decision-making process for the buyer.

The cost of styling is very subjective. You may have an interior-design eye and are capable of arranging the rooms in such a way that they look best, or you may need to outsource this task to get the most out of your space. Either way, the importance of a well-presented property is crucial. It could be as simple as some light garden maintenance, or you may need to spend some money or more extensive repairs to damaged doors or dented walls.

Never underestimate the impact of a fresh coat of paint and some good quality carpet cleaning.

The (real) costs of selling a house (or apartment) that you need to be aware of

As with any sale, you need to take the costs of the process into account when determining your profit. If you have waited long enough, or are lucky to be in a boom area, the expenses listed above will be but a small dent in your overall profit.

If the margin is tight, this may deem your property sale a fruitless venture. This is why understanding the above charges in the context of your budget is crucial to the successful sale of your property.

Exact costs will also depend on which state your property is in, and you can also obtain an online property value estimate to ensure you are working on the correct budget. It is always a good idea to book a property appraisal which will shine a light on which maintenance tasks can help increase your home’s value.

If you have an ideal sale date in mind, you can divide by the number of weeks until said date by your expected costs to form a realistic budget. Just remember to leave a buffer for any unexpected expenses that may arise — being generous when budget planning is never a bad idea.

© Copyright 2015 – 2019 First Chance Group Pty Ltd.

What effect will the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive have?

Tuesday, July 30th, 2019

First Time Home Buyers’ Program ? will it work?

Mortgage Broker News

Ron Butler – Mortgage broker – Butler Mortgage 

“The First-Time Home Buyer Incentive will either have little effect on housing in Canada or maybe zero effect. There is a federal election in October, and the program won’t appear till September. If a new government takes power, who is to know if the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive would survive the change of regime? 

Based on the program’s limitations, it can only work in specific markets at specific prices, and at this time, seven weeks after the announcement was made, we still don’t know enough about it to say if Canadians will even want it.”

Len Lane – Owner/broker – Brokers For Life 

“This is a hard question to answer at this time, as there still seem to be so many unanswered questions about the program. While a $120,000-a-year household income is pretty standard for many Canadian families, it still has to pass the stress test at today’s 5.34% benchmark.  

There are so many questions about the long-term effects of having the insurers as your ‘partner’ in your home, such as will they share in gains or losses on your home sale? Seeing the final rules will help decide if it’s right for first-time buyers or just another poorly thought-out government program on housing.” 

Jason Georgopoulos – Mortgage broker – Dominion Lending Centres Estate Mortgages  

“I’m skeptical that this policy – announced in an election year – will come into effect. Should the Conservatives win office, they may have their own first-time homebuyer stimulus plans.  

In any case, effects would be limited; many of my clients have already decided it isn’t for them. Purchasers would have to be OK with the government owning a piece of their property; should property values increase significantly, buyers may owe the government more than the interest saved by the additional down payment. Adding additional complexity to an already stressful process for a relatively small benefit will have many buyers choosing to pass.” 

Copyright © 2019 Key Media


Victoria maintains healthy sales pace

Monday, July 29th, 2019

June sales in Victoria 4.5% more than in June 2018

Neil Sharma

If British Columbia’s housing market is in a slump, nobody told buyers and sellers in Victoria.

While only 740 properties sold in June, it was a 4.5% boost over June 2018, according to the Victoria Real Estate Board. However, while there was a marked drop in June sales compared to the previous month—12.7% to be exact—especially in the condo market where sales were down 6.1%, single-family homes sales surged 10.4% with 394 houses sold.

According to Polly Cordwell, managing broker for Sotheby’s International Realty Canada, there is a lot of construction in Victoria right now, from infrastructure projects to residential real estate development.

“In a lot of areas here, it’s definitely increased quite significantly, even versus last year. There are a lot of different municipalities that make up Greater Victoria, and there are some with big increases,” she said. Certainly helping matters, Mayor Lisa Helps is pro-development and it’s writ-large all over Langford, added Cordwell.

“Victoria is doing very well. We’re seeing that home sales over $1 million have definitely dropped off, but there are a lot of properties under $1m here in Victoria—the benchmark price is under $1m—and this year the market is performing similarly to last year, which was a good year for us.”

Of course, booming markets become expensive and Victoria is no exception, but compared to Vancouver, from which there’s been an influx of residents in Victoria, it’s still a bargain.

“Condo development and a lot of rental construction here are helping meet the marketplace’s needs,” said Cordwell. “The population is growing and the community needs to build more housing because it’s difficult for people to find housing here right now.”

Like bigger cities, Victoria is slow to approve developments for rezoning and it’s causing a supply lag in the market. As demand continues escalating in tandem with Victoria’s desirability, that will be problematic, says Cordwell.

“We have a lot of people wanting to move here from Vancouver, and even with prices in Vancouver dropping, for a lot of people it’s not affordable enough over there,” she said. “In the higher end of the market, we’ll see it slower, but in homes under $1m that are more affordable for people, it will continue on at a steady pace.”

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

Vancouver commits to green building with ambitious action plan

Monday, July 29th, 2019

Greenest City 2020 Action Plan initiated

Neil Sharma
Canadian Real Estate Wealth

Vancouver’s green building sector is getting a major boost, thanks to an initiative from the municipal government that intends to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in existing buildings 20% below 2007 levels and require buildings constructed from 2020 henceforward to be carbon neutral in operations.

The “Greenest City 2020 Action Plan” will catapult a city with one of the cleanest building codes in North America to the summit and create an abundance of jobs in its green building sector.

“Vancouver’s next challenge is to improve the environmental performance of existing building stock by focusing on retrofits such as insulation, heating and lighting system upgrades and energy-efficient appliances, as well as on how people operate buildings,” read the city’s Action Plan. “In British Columbia, we continue to have access to relatively inexpensive energy sources. In addition, the landlords and developers who make decisions about new designs or retrofits don’t often pay the utility bills and don’t immediately benefit from efficiency savings that can take time to show return on initial investments.”

Lane Theriault, president of Subterra Renewables, commends the City of Vancouver for both its lofty ambitions and being proactive, but noted that the last mile is always the most difficult to traverse. Where Vancouver’s building regulations are about three years ahead of Toronto’s, with respect to mitigating environmental impact, it could hit a snag unless certain green building principles are adhered to.

“The city has a progressive building code, which is admirable, but the last mile of GHG reductions is always hard to do,” he said. “Personally, I’d like to see a ban on natural gas, or at least make it a premium and use it for things like cooking, but it shouldn’t be used for hot water. Without eliminating on-site GHG production, you won’t get that last piece done.”

However, the onus cannot solely be on developers, added Theriault. The faster consumers adopt an eco-conscious mindset, the quicker the cost reduction.

“Developers constantly face a trade-off where they have to spend more money or reduce the marketability of their developments by having smaller windows to make buildings more energy-efficient. Consumers have to choose to live in places that are green, or buy developments from builders who build green. Ask questions about whether this building uses renewable energy or burns gas. It’s a great way to let developers know the customer cares and they will have more of a desire to green their buildings.”

Vancouver has Canada’s most expensive residential real estate prices, so buying green isn’t likely to top buyers’ lists of priorities. But the Action Plan makes mentions of financing tools and incentives as ways to offset exorbitant pricing schemes.

“Financing tools and incentives provide ways to address concerns of affordability and fairness, and increase the pace of change towards green developments and retrofits,” continued the Action Plan. “One example of this strategy is the development of the Home Energy Loan Program, which provides homeowners with affordable financing for energy efficiency upgrades. The money saved on energy bills can significantly offset the loan payments. Capacity building The City is in a unique position to bring together different groups and build partnerships that ensure there are enough skilled workers to meet the needs of a rapidly growing green building sector. This will make a significant contribution to new green jobs in Vancouver.”

Copyright © 2019 Key Media Pty Ltd

The Westerly in Nanoose Bay 39 one and two bedroom homes by Seacliff Properties

Saturday, July 27th, 2019

The Westerly, an upscale 39-unit oceanfront project from Vancouver-based Seacliff Properties.

Barbara Gunn
The Vancouver Sun

In terms of established master-planned communities, Vancouver Island’s Fairwinds is more than a little noteworthy.

Created more than 30 years ago, the 750-acre community in Nanoose Bay — about a 20-minute drive up island from Nanaimo and its ferry crossing to the mainland — is now home to some 1,000 people. In the years ahead, however, that number is expected to grow considerably, given plans to add more than 2,000 residences, including townhomes, condos, single-family homes and waterfront rental units.

Call it a master, master plan.

The newest addition to Fairwinds, home to a 350-berth marina and the award-winning Fairwinds Golf Club — it hosted the B.C. Junior Boys Golf Championship earlier this month — is The Westerly, an upscale 39-unit oceanfront project from Vancouver-based Seacliff Properties.

The six-storey building, with one- and two-bedroom homes ranging up to 1,800 square feet, will be a standout compared to anything constructed in the earlier phases at Fairwinds, says Julie Jaworski, marketing and communications manager at Fairwinds.

“Nothing like this exists at Fairwinds,” she says, noting that The Westerly is expected to draw buyers from the Lower Mainland and well beyond.

“We’re looking at affluent 50-year-plus individuals, white-collar professionals likely moving from Calgary, Vancouver and other metropolitan areas to the island permanently or part-time,” she says. “They’re generally lifestyle-oriented people who enjoy the outdoors and are often looking to slow down, but not necessarily retire.”

At Fairwinds, the outdoor pursuits those residents can enjoy are myriad, with endless opportunities for hiking, fishing, boating, biking, bird-watching and beachcombing.

“The master design leaves plenty of wild and green space, ensuring that this community will never feel crowded, just welcoming,” Jaworski says.

But the recreational offerings extend far beyond those related to Fairwinds’ natural, oceanside setting.

The community’s 20,000-square-foot Fairness Wellness Club includes an indoor pool, hot tub, sauna, tennis court, weight rooms and multi-purpose room for badminton, pickleball and fitness classes.

As well, the soon-to-be completed Fairwinds Landing will be “the new heart of Fairwinds,” Jaworski says, “with plenty of amenities and residential and commercial space in a desirable waterside location adjacent to the marina.”

Should residents — Jaworksi calls them “Fairwinders” — wish to relax with their neighbours in the comfort of their homes, they will be able to do so in units with large covered balconies, many with ocean outlooks.

The contemporary residences will also have large windows with roller shade coverings, nine-foot-high ceilings and gas fireplaces.

Floors in the main living areas will be topped with engineered wood, while bedrooms will have plush carpeting underfoot. Most homes will also have walk-in closets.

Kitchens will be fitted with soft-close drawers and doors, under-cabinet lighting, quartz countertops and tile backsplashes.

Bathrooms will have undermount sinks, quartz counters and tile flooring and shower and tub surrounds. Master ensuites will be fitted with heated floors.

Common spaces at The Westerly include a multi-purpose amenity room and landscaped grounds with walking paths. The building will also include underground parking and a storage area for bicycles.

Meantime, Jaworski says, next up at Fairwinds will be a 35-unit townhome project called Timber Ridge, situated on some 11 acres overlooking the Strait of Georgia.

The Westerly

Project location: Fairwinds, Nanoose Bay, B.C.

Developer: Seacliff Properties

Project size: 39 one- and two-bedroom homes

Residence size: Approx. 1,500 — 1,800 square feet

Prices: $450,000 — $1,190,000

Sales centre: 3455 Fairwinds Drive, Nanoose Bay

Telephone: 250-387-4162


© 2019 Postmedia Network Inc.