Other
Archive for May, 2013
Competition Bureau appeals TREB decision
Wednesday, May 15th, 2013Other
The Competition Bureau has appealed a ruling by the Competition Tribunal that dismissed the bureau’s complaint against the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB).
“The bureau believes that the tribunal’s ruling was based on an overly narrow interpretation of section 79 of the Competition Act – the ‘abuse of dominance’ provision,” says the Competition Bureau in a news release. “The tribunal ruled that TREB, as an incorporated trade association, does not compete with its own members in the real estate brokerage market and therefore cannot be found to have contravened the abuse of dominance provision,” says the bureau.
“Allowing the tribunal’s finding to stand could leave a significant loophole in the application of the Competition Act,” says interim commissioner of competition John Pecman in the release. “While most trade associations comply with the Competition Act, we are concerned that, if the tribunal’s decision is left to stand, trade associations may be tempted to develop rules aimed at preventing or eliminating potential new forms of competition.”
Pecman says: “We believe that the Competition Tribunal erred in dismissing our application and in not ruling on the facts of the case. It is our view that TREB’s anti-competitive behaviour continues to restrict potential homebuyers and sellers from taking advantage of a greater range of service and pricing options when making one of the most significant financial transactions of their lives.”
In the appeal, the bureau is asking that the court:
– Set aside the order of the tribunal dismissing the application;
– Order that the matter be returned to the tribunal “for a determination of the commissioner’s application in accordance with this court’s reasons;”
– “Set aside the tribunal’s order for costs and order that costs be determined by the tribunal on it determination of the application'”
– “Order that TREB pay to the commissioner his costs of this appeal;” and
– “Grant such further and other relief to the commissioner as the court may deem just.”
REM
Fraser Valley Real Estate Market: April 2013
Thursday, May 9th, 2013Elizabeth Wilson
Other
“Balanced,” “steady” and “slower than average” are how FVREB president Ron Todson describes the current real estate market in the Fraser Valley. The spring rush has been later and more subdued than usual, but home sales did increase by almost 20 per cent over March.
New listings picked up too, increasing the active inventory by over 5 per cent compared to March.
However, April’s sales, new listings and active listings are all below the levels of last year. Keep in mind, April of 2012 was the second-lowest April in 10 years for sales, and third-highest for listings. That makes April of 2013 a very sluggish market indeed.
According to Todson, “What’s different this year is that a number of external factors, such as tighter credit rules and the government’s spotlight on consumer debt have made some consumers more cautious about buying or selling a property. However, for those who need to move to a bigger or smaller home or to another community before summer hits, its business as usual because when you need a home, you need a home.”
Sales and Listings
Overall MLS® real estate sales* in April reached 1,366, and increase of 21.1 per cent over March, but down 4.8 per cent compared to the 1,435 sales in April of 2012.
Of the April 2013 sales reported, 1,203 were residential property sales. They were up 18.5 per cent from March’s home sales, but down 5.2 per cent from those of last April.
Detached houses made up the majority of the April home sales—784 houses changed hands compared to 256 attached properties and 213 condo apartments. For comparison, in the Greater Vancouver market, condo sales are almost as high as house sales: 1,064 houses sold last month compared to 1,052 condos.
New residential listings in the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board region were down 7.3 per cent from last April: 2,454 compared to 2,645 in April of 2012. Compared to March, new listings of homes were up 10.1 per cent.
That helped boost active residential listings. They’re up 5.4 per cent compared to March, and down 2.6 per cent from last April, when listings were very high. There were 7,466 homes for sale in the Fraser Valley last month compared to 7,662 in April 2012.
Despite the slow sales, the overall sales-to-active listings ratio reached 14 per cent in April, up from 12 per cent in March. By the FVREB’s standards, that’s still well within buyer’s market territory. It would need to reach 18 per cent to hit the balanced market category.
|
What’s Up, What’s Down – At a Glance |
||
|
|
Apr / Mar 2013 |
Apr 2013/ Apr 2012 |
|
Overall Home Sales |
+18.5% |
-5.2% |
|
– Detached |
+35.7% |
-6.4% |
|
– Townhouse |
+1.6% |
-6.6% |
|
– Apartment |
+13.3% |
+1.4% |
|
New Listings |
+10.1 |
-7.3% |
|
Active Listings |
+5.4% |
–2.6% |
The balance between listings and sales is keeping prices stable, so it’s a good time to be a buyer: enough properties to look at, not too much competition to buy, and little likelihood of a bidding war breaking out.
MLS® Benchmark Prices
|
Fraser Valley MLS® Benchmark Prices, % Change |
|||
|
|
Apr 2013 |
Mar 2013 |
Apr 2012 |
|
Detached |
$547,300 |
+0.6% |
+0.4% |
|
Townhouse |
$299,100 |
+0.3% |
-2.2% |
|
Apartment |
$203,900 |
-0.1% |
+0.04% |
Ron Todson says, “Depending on the market area and property type, prices are either slightly up or down based on desirability and availability of product, underscoring the importance of understanding what’s going on in your specific area, which is exactly where REALTORS® can help.”
This table can also give you an idea. It shows price movements in the MLS Home Price Index by municipality.
* FVREB’s overall sales numbers include all types of property including commercial, agricultural and industrial.
